It Is Done

So last night, on an impulse, I went for it.

Of course, by "on an impulse" I mean "sight-unseen after the requisite three weeks of obsessing," and by "I went for it" I mean, "I ordered my MacBook Pro."

What I finally decided on was the 17" model with the anti-glare screen and the 7200 RPM hard drive. There was a part of me that wanted to just get the stock configuration. It would have certainly satisfied my desire for immediate gratification to just walk into an Apple Store and grab one. I also love the aesthetic of the all-black glossy screen; it's one of the things that drew me to this latest round of MacBooks in the first place. But since this is intended to be my main machine for some time to come (I hope to get at least three years out of it) I wanted to make sure I got it right.

I was very tempted by the SSD drives, I must admit. But they're a horrendously expensive add-on to an already pricey machine, and they're fairly small for the money at this point in time, so I decided to compromise and get the faster, larger HDD. I figure, sometime down the line, when I'm looking to upgrade the machine, I can get an SSD and install it myself. They will be cheaper and bigger by then, and will extend the life of the machine. While I'd love the speed boost, I can surely live with SATA speeds. I've been doing it for years. Besides, newness and Snow Leopard should provide at least an initial speed bump.

The decision to get the anti-glare option was a tougher one. I've read all manner of conflicting reports about the quality of the glossy screens. Some people love them; some people hate them; some people claim that they're inherently inferior.  The best, most current information I found was at Rob Galbraith. This is a great rundown of the issues, and they even have an extremely useful interactive graphic that illustrates the difference in glare between the two screens. The basic conclusion is that, in terms of color accuracy, the latest round of MBPs are all very, very good, glossy or no. I was surprised to read that the glossy and anti-glare screens are fairly equal in this regard. But the glare is the real issue, and it's significant. Since I'll be sporting that big, giant 17" screen, it will make it all the harder to adjust that glare away. And, after taking a close a look at a friend's screen, I do think it would bother me after a while. By the forums and surveys I've seen, glossy screens seem to be preferred by folks who consume a lot of media on their machines — they make movies look great. But for folks mainly who use their computers to create and work and make a living, the anti-glare option seems to be the way to go. And I surely fall into that latter camp. While I'll miss the look of the black bezel, I think in the long run it will be easier to adjust to the silver bezel than it will to the glare.

I also got a Mini Display Port to DVI adapter and an Applecare warranty. And since I get an educational discount, I qualify for a free 8GB iPod Touch, which goes right to my sweetie. Not a bad day, all in all.

So now I wait. I'm pretty confident with my decision, but a little nervous about getting the thing sight-unseen. But more than anything, I'm excited!

Convergence

It occurs to me that the themes of the last two posts will likely soon converge. When I buy my new MacBook Pro it will come with Snow Leopard, thus negating much need for pre-ordering the beast at all, which I've spent the last two weeks obsessively worrying over.

And, speaking of, pre-ordering, while I'm glad to have helped out Daring Fireball, I'm still waiting on the shipment. That's right, Amazon hasn't even shipped the order yet. Not sure what the point of pre-ordering is if you end up getting your order a week after everyone else. Looks like I can still pre-order it, in fact. Because Amazon just doesn't have it yet. So, a word to the wise: If you're expecting an Amazon pre-order of an Apple product to be in your hands on release day — or anywhere close, for that matter — don't. It doesn't work like that. The good news is, Amazon's giving me a $20 discount on my pre-order. So that's cool.

I guess if I'd played all this right I'd have just gotten my Snow Leopard MacBook and forgone the hand-wringing. Or at least focused said hand-wringing exclusively on which MacBook Pro to get. 17" or 15"? 17" or 15"? 17" or 15"?

Oh, and, "Glossy screen or matte? Glossy screen or matte? Glossy screen or matte?"

In any case, it's done now. And so I wait.

Shifting Needs

Some time ago I predicted that in the future I could see myself moving from a tower to a laptop as my primary system. And while I didn't think this would happen so soon — I thought I'd at least live out the life of my current 8-core Mac Pro — I now find myself seriously considering making the switch sometime in the very near future. I suppose if you live in New York it will happen sooner or later. Everything here comes down to space.

On a recent furniture-moving — and the resultant space-assessing — binge, I've started wanting to clean my life of unnecessary possessions. (Admittedly, a few episodes of that Hoarders show have helped to spur this on as well.) So I've been looking around the house for things I might reduce or cut altogether, space-saving measures. Since computers are a large part of my life, they naturally come under consideration. And when I honestly survey my computer usage I have to admit, I hardly ever use my tower anymore. Instead, my "primary computer" — if you can define "primary computer" as the computer you use the most — is my bajillion-year-old PowerBook Titanium. Yes, you heard me right. Titanium. Shit is old.

There are a bunch of reasons I prefer portability to power these days. One is that I'm doing far more lightweight work. Once was a time when I did a great deal of video work, and that meant compression. And working on and compressing video taxes nearly every resource a computer has, particularly the processor. These days, however, you can reverse most of that: I'm not doing much video at all lately (I've mostly shifted to drawing, which requires no computer resources whatsoever), and video is far less taxing than it once was. In fact, unless you're compressing numerous (like more than three or four) streams of video simultaneously, you'll probably do about as well on any of Apple's MacBook Pros. They're all plenty fast enough for most basic video needs. And my waning creation of video, and the increasingly powerful nature of computers have converged to make my video needs quite basic indeed.

The other big draw to the portability camp is space. I live in New York, and as any New Yorker knows, space is at a premium. A desktop system takes up all sorts of space. Not just the tower itself either. You need a desk, for one thing. You need all manner of cable, for another. And I keep my tower plugged into a giant Tripplite power conditioner, which also takes up a bunch of space. The square footage used by my tower system in my small Manhattan apartment is sinful at this point. It's just wrong. Especially considering that I hardly ever use it. And I hardly ever use it partly because it's become so ungainly to use, its crazy jumble of cables and peripherals all shoved together in a hot mass of discomfort at my small desk in my tiny office. Replaced by a laptop, the major problems associated with a tower go away.

So I'm considering the 17" MacBook Pro. Since this will be replacing my tower, I would like something that has a bit of screen real estate and resolution. I mean, I'll still be doing some video, after all. The 17" also boasts longer battery life. It seems to me the best balance between the power and comfort of a desktop system and the portability and space-saving of a laptop. Plenty big for serious work, and yet, while not the most portable in the lineup, still plenty small to easily stow away when not in use.

The one big drawback to the 17" is the immense price tag it carries. For about $800 less I could get a 15" model, which, though perhaps not ideal, would certainly be plenty of machine for my current needs, and even more portable. And it's got that cool SD slot.

So I'm a bit on the fence. I suppose to some extent it comes down to how much cash I can get for my tower. I'm currently considering an even trade with a friend of mine for her 17", and if that goes through I think I'd be pretty pleased.

Nevertheless, I've never used a 17" MacBook Pro for any length of time. I'd be curious to hear from any 17" users on their experiences. Is the 17" comparable — or better, or worse — than a Desktop system? What are the drawbacks of these beasts? How inconvenient are they to lug around? Are they good for video?

I'd also love to hear from desktop-to-laptop switchers. Anyone out there make the switch? Are you glad you did? Do you miss your desktop system?

I've read all the MacBook reviews I could find, and they're glowing. But if you have any experiences you'd like to share, feel free to leave them in the comments. They'd be most welcome.

Apple Tablet? Really?

If this is what the rumored Apple tablet is going to be — basically a bigger version of the iPod Touch — then I'll pass. I mean, really, what's the point of a device like this? It's too big to be an iPod or an extremely mobile computing device like the iPhone, and I already have an iPhone anyway. Yet it's too small and underpowered to be useful in the ways a laptop is useful, as a real computer that just happens to be portable. In fact, the only niche I see a device like this filling is the netbook niche, which Apple has already eschewed, and which I agree will prove to be a flash in the pan, a fad. I guess it's possible they could be going for gamers, but that seems unlikely to me. The Apple tablet that I'm hearing about sounds like a netbook with a touchscreen, which, frankly, just isn't compelling in the least.

Besides, I thought the advantage of tablet computers was that you could draw on them. I thought they were for artists. This thing doesn't look like you're meant to use it that way at all. And isn't the whole reason Apple went with a virtual keyboard on the iPhone because of the small size of the device, to conserve space? What would be the purpose on a larger device?

I realize all is speculation at this point, and maybe I'm missing something about this thing that isn't obvious because the device hasn't even been announced. I mean, who knows, maybe it's something completely revolutionary, like nothing we've ever seen before, with fabulous, new untold uses and capabilities. Or, hell, maybe you can draw on it. That would be great.

But if this thing's for real and it's anything like the rumors say it is, I'm amazed anyone's excited about it at all. It sounds like a computer without a purpose.

Oh, and one more thing: when it comes out they should call it the Ablet. Right? Don't you think?

Totally.

iPhone Battery Indicator

I'm with Mr. Gruber. While I think it's cool that you can now see the iPhone's remaining battery life as a percentage, doing so is only making me tense and nervous as my battery life trickles away before my eyes. I'm turning it off.